Evidence-Led Reporting
Clear reporting designed for both technical infrastructure teams and executive decision-makers.
Test the routes an attacker could use into and through your environment. Firewalls, remote access, identity services and network segmentation are expected to slow or stop an attacker. World Computing safely tests whether those controls work together in practice.
Network penetration testing actively validates weaknesses across an agreed set of internet-facing or internal systems. It goes beyond identifying software versions: the test examines how configuration, credentials, trust relationships, access controls and network design can be combined to achieve unauthorised access or movement.
Considers the viewpoint of an internet-based attacker targeting public IP ranges, exposed services, remote management, and boundary firewalls.
Evaluates potential impact from a compromised workstation, guest network connection, office access point, or authorised test device.
Begins with a specified foothold to focus specifically on privilege escalation, Active Directory compromise, and lateral movement.
We evaluate your perimeter filtering, service configurations, identity controls, and internal segmentation boundaries.
Public IP addresses, exposed services, remote administration, VPN gateways, mail and name services, perimeter filtering and information leakage.
Insecure protocols, avoidable services, default settings, known vulnerabilities, weak encryption and unsafe management exposure.
Password policy, credential reuse, authentication protocols, service accounts, privileged access and opportunities for credential interception or relay.
Paths from a standard or limited user account to local, domain, cloud or network administration privileges.
Trust relationships, remote administration, file services, management platforms and routes between hosts or security zones.
Whether user, server, management, guest, wireless and sensitive zones enforce the intended access restrictions.
Active Directory and connected identity components, including delegation, group permissions, legacy protocols and control of high-value accounts.
Wireless access points, site-to-site connections, cloud network controls and boundary devices explicitly included in scope.
A controlled 6-stage testing methodology aligned with NCSC and NIST SP 800-115 standards.
Confirm IP ranges, locations, test perspective, credentials, exclusions, windows, monitoring expectations and emergency contacts.
Identify live systems, exposed services, trust relationships and attack paths using controlled techniques.
Review configuration and vulnerability evidence, then safely validate selected weaknesses.
Where authorised, demonstrate privilege escalation, lateral movement or segmentation bypass with minimal impact.
Communicate critical findings immediately during the engagement rather than waiting for the final report.
Deliver technical and executive outputs, then verify fixes included in the agreed re-test.
Clear input requirements and executive outputs delivered at completion.
Denial-of-service, destructive actions, persistence and uncontrolled password attacks are excluded unless separately approved and risk-managed. Critical systems and operational technology require additional safeguards; a laboratory or non-operational environment may be safer. Testing is time-bound and limited to the authorised ranges recorded in the rules of engagement.
Clear reporting designed for both technical infrastructure teams and executive decision-makers.
Testing designed around your actual business risk, technology stack and operational constraints.
Findings prioritised for remediation with practical guidance rather than alarmist language.
A collaborative approach that supports developers, infrastructure teams and service owners throughout.
A scan identifies potential known weaknesses across a broad scope. A penetration test adds expert analysis and controlled exploitation to show which issues are real, how they combine and what an attacker could achieve.
The engagement is designed to minimise disruption. We agree exclusions, rate limits, test windows and stop conditions. No active test is completely risk-free, so critical or fragile systems require specific planning.
Not necessarily. The starting access depends on the scenario. Credentials may be used for an assumed-breach test or for authenticated review, while an external test commonly starts without them.
Yes, where the customer has authority and the cloud provider's testing rules are followed. Scope must identify accounts, subscriptions, virtual networks and any managed services that should not be actively tested.
External testing is normally remote. Internal testing can be remote through an agreed access method or performed on site, depending on the environment and assurance objective.
We use the agreed escalation contact to communicate urgent issues promptly, provide enough evidence for containment and continue only in accordance with the rules of engagement.
Discover vulnerabilities before attackers can exploit them. Clear technical findings, business-risk explanations, and actionable remediation recommendations.
Read full briefing →An engineering-led analysis of emerging attack vectors targeting web applications, mobile APIs, and enterprise network perimeters.
Read full briefing →A step-by-step guide to preparing your organisation for cyber incidents — detection, containment, eradication, and recovery.
Read full briefing →Breaking down the SolarWinds breach and what every security team must do to protect against supply chain compromise.
Read full briefing →Discuss your scope, priorities and the most suitable testing approach with World Computing.
Book Scoping Call → info@worldcomputing.co.uk