Evidence-Led Reporting
Clear reporting designed for both technical development teams and executive decision-makers.
Protect data on the device, through the API and across every trust boundary. World Computing combines static and dynamic analysis with practical abuse testing to show where an iOS or Android app could expose data or allow misuse.
Security depends on local storage, operating-system protections, application code, third-party software development kits, transport security, authentication flows and the APIs behind the app. Weakness in any one of these layers can undermine the whole service.
Coverage is informed by the OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard (MASVS) and Mobile Application Security Testing Guide (MASTG), adjusted for actual business risk.
We evaluate your mobile application package, device runtime state, and connected backend infrastructure.
Application components, permissions, exported interfaces, platform services, third-party SDKs, update paths and backend dependencies.
Databases, preferences, files, caches, logs, backups, screenshots, notifications, clipboard use and data persistence.
Login, registration, multi-factor authentication, biometric use, token storage, expiry, logout and device binding.
Transport encryption, certificate validation, endpoint trust, proxy behaviour, and interception resilience.
Use of platform key stores, random number generation, hard-coded secrets, and key protection mechanisms.
Deep links, custom URL schemes, intents, inter-process communication, web views, and accessibility exposures.
Debugging, tampering, reverse engineering, obfuscation, root/jailbreak conditions and runtime manipulation.
Permissions, tracking, excessive data collection, backend authorization, workflow abuse, and client trust.
OWASP MASVS, OWASP MASTG, OWASP API Security guidance, and NCSC penetration-testing frameworks.
A structured 6-stage testing lifecycle designed for thorough assurance without operational risk.
Confirm platforms, app versions, distribution method, backend scope, user roles, devices and source code availability.
Obtain agreed application packages, test accounts, API documentation, test data and environment requirements.
Review package structure, configuration, permissions, secrets, libraries and security implementation choices.
Exercise the running application, observe local/network behavior and safely manipulate inputs and workflows.
Test whether weaknesses cross from the device into user accounts, APIs, data or privileged business functions.
Deliver evidence-led findings and verify remediated builds or backend changes included in the re-test.
Everything needed to execute a successful mobile security assessment.
Testing uses agreed test accounts, devices and data. We do not access other customers' information, disrupt live services or bypass platform controls outside authorised scope. Some resilience tests, such as runtime manipulation or rooted-device scenarios, are performed only where they match the threat model. The assessment is point-in-time and applies to the specified build and backend scope.
Clear reporting designed for both technical development teams and executive decision-makers.
Assessments designed around your actual business risk, technology stack and operational constraints.
Findings prioritized for remediation with practical guidance rather than alarmist language.
A collaborative approach that supports developers, infrastructure teams and service owners throughout.
Yes. They are treated as separate platforms because their security models, application packages and attack surfaces differ. A cross-platform app normally requires coverage of both builds.
Yes, although a development or enterprise build may provide better visibility for some tests. We agree which build gives the right balance between release realism and depth of assurance.
It can be. Mobile security is often inseparable from API security, so the scope should identify the endpoints and user roles that support the app. A large API estate may justify a separate engagement.
Not for every assessment. Those conditions can help test resilience and local protections, but they are used only when relevant to the threat model and agreed scope.
We identify security-relevant SDKs and how they affect permissions, data flows and attack surface. A full source-level review of every dependency requires a specifically agreed white-box scope.
Repeat testing after material changes to authentication, local storage, cryptography, platform integrations, SDKs, backend APIs or high-risk workflows, and on a risk-based periodic schedule.
Discover vulnerabilities before attackers can exploit them. Clear technical findings, business-risk explanations, and actionable remediation recommendations.
Read full briefing →An engineering-led analysis of emerging attack vectors targeting web applications, mobile APIs, and enterprise network perimeters.
Read full briefing →A step-by-step guide to preparing your organisation for cyber incidents — detection, containment, eradication, and recovery.
Read full briefing →Breaking down the SolarWinds breach and what every security team must do to protect against supply chain compromise.
Read full briefing →Discuss your scope, priorities and the most suitable mobile testing approach with World Computing.
Book Scoping Call → info@worldcomputing.co.uk